[Interpretationandmethods] advice on job talks

Lara Rusch rusch at kettering.org
Fri Nov 2 16:43:09 EDT 2007


Thank you -- that helps!

Lara Rusch

Pre-Doctoral Research Associate
Kettering Foundation
200 Commons Road
Dayton, OH  45459
937-434-7300 ext. 859
fax 937-439-9837

interpretation and methods group
<interpretationandmethods at listserv.cddc.vt.edu> writes:
>Hmmm, I'm not sure that I have much advice.  I will say that I just  
>gave a jobtalk, which was the hour long version of the 15 minute talk  
>that i gave at last years conference.   The sole criticism was that  
>some of the audience would have liked a model of the interaction  
>between communities or publics and their interpretations of the  
>policy appliances.  I take this as evidence that they wanted  
>something that was a very clear diagram of what was happening, which  
>I could have provided, but hadn't thought of providing.
>
>Other than that, make sure you are clear about your theory/context,  
>your evidence/interpretations, and your conclusions and then how your  
>conclusions contribute to whatever the literature of the job is as  
>advertised/discussed.  That's what I always want from a job talk, and  
>usually people miss at least one of those.
>
>My best advise after doing around 10 talks now is:  practice your job  
>talk at least one time in your department, and go to any and every  
>job talk you can find out about on your campus.  Speculation will get  
>you in over your head, go to other departments job talks see what  
>counts there, see who gets the offer.
>
>
>
>
>On Nov 2, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Lara Rusch wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> A lot of advice is floating around my dept.'s grad list right now  
>> about
>> job talk presentations.
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has particular advice or recommendations  
>> for job
>> talk presentations using interpretive methods? I'm sure I'm not the  
>> only
>> one wondering about this...
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Lara Rusch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interpretationandmethods mailing list
>> Interpretationandmethods at listserv.cddc.vt.edu
>> http://listserv.cddc.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/interpretationandmethods
>
>jeremy hunsinger
>Information Ethics Fellow, Center for Information Policy Research,  
>School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee  
>(www.cipr.uwm.edu)
>
>wiki.tmttlt.com
>www.tmttlt.com
>
>()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
>/\                        - against microsoft attachments
>http://www.stswiki.org/  sts wiki
>http://cfp.learning-inquiry.info/  Learning Inquiry-the journal
>http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/  Transdisciplinary  
>Studies:the book series
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Interpretationandmethods mailing list
>Interpretationandmethods at listserv.cddc.vt.edu
>http://listserv.cddc.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/interpretationandmethods




More information about the Interpretationandmethods mailing list